4 thoughts on “The guy asked the salary performance in the company's WeChat group, and was lifted the contract. Is the company's approach legal?”
Elijah
I think the company's approach is reasonable, because the company system clearly states that we cannot talk about salary in public. The young man should go to a private chat instead of saying in the group.
The company's approach is illegal, and the unilateral termination of the labor contract is definitely not good. If the contract is terminated by the provisions of the illegal company, the contract needs to be clearly specified, otherwise it is invalid.
Illegal, Lawyer Qiu Wenfeng of Sichuan Henghe Law Firm said that the company should pay wages on time, and the arrears of wages shall bear corresponding legal liabilities. In this incident, the company announced in the group to release the information of Tang Moumou's labor contract. It contains the remarks that have not been confirmed by Tang, and even the termination of its labor contract as a punishment, suspected of infringing Tang Moumou's reputation.
The company's approach is illegal, and it must be severely punished in accordance with the law to the end in order to better ensure the legitimate rights and interests of each migrant worker. The guy's WeChat group quality questioned salary performance was terminated. The Tang Moumou has just joined a year. In Chengdu, a technology company in Chengdu originated from the business department. The employee labor contract was issued on the 10th of each month. In October, the salary was not received until November 16, and he felt very puzzled, so he asked about the incident in the WeChat group inside the company. Credit cards have been overdue. After the company's leadership department learned about the situation, he immediately lifted the contract's contract. At the same time, it was said that the guy's remarks seriously interfered with the normal work order. I couldn't understand them, so I went to the lawyer. The company stipulates that "removal must be clearly stipulated, otherwise it will be invalid. The company's approach is illegal. The company recruits employees and employees to contribute to the company. Getting salary is an equal thing. If it is unreasonable to fired it under the premise of signing a labor contract, it is unreasonable. The person in charge said in an interview. The issue of salary issuance is mainly to be dealt with seriously after the issue of the human resources department. What to look at this problem from the perspective of the law? In the process of working, the worker must learn to retain evidence. Only in this way can he be invincible. The company shall pay wages on time, and the arrears of wages shall bear the corresponding legal responsibility. In this incident, the company announces the information that to dismiss their labor contract in the group. According to the labor contract law and labor dispute arbitration, mediation law, etc., the labor arbitration should be mentioned as soon as possible to protect their rights in accordance with the law to ensure that their legitimate rights and interests are not infringed.
I think the company's approach is reasonable, because the company system clearly states that we cannot talk about salary in public. The young man should go to a private chat instead of saying in the group.
The company's approach is illegal, and the unilateral termination of the labor contract is definitely not good. If the contract is terminated by the provisions of the illegal company, the contract needs to be clearly specified, otherwise it is invalid.
Illegal, Lawyer Qiu Wenfeng of Sichuan Henghe Law Firm said that the company should pay wages on time, and the arrears of wages shall bear corresponding legal liabilities. In this incident, the company announced in the group to release the information of Tang Moumou's labor contract. It contains the remarks that have not been confirmed by Tang, and even the termination of its labor contract as a punishment, suspected of infringing Tang Moumou's reputation.
The company's approach is illegal, and it must be severely punished in accordance with the law to the end in order to better ensure the legitimate rights and interests of each migrant worker.
The guy's WeChat group quality questioned salary performance was terminated.
The Tang Moumou has just joined a year. In Chengdu, a technology company in Chengdu originated from the business department. The employee labor contract was issued on the 10th of each month. In October, the salary was not received until November 16, and he felt very puzzled, so he asked about the incident in the WeChat group inside the company. Credit cards have been overdue. After the company's leadership department learned about the situation, he immediately lifted the contract's contract. At the same time, it was said that the guy's remarks seriously interfered with the normal work order. I couldn't understand them, so I went to the lawyer. The company stipulates that "removal must be clearly stipulated, otherwise it will be invalid.
The company's approach is illegal.
The company recruits employees and employees to contribute to the company. Getting salary is an equal thing. If it is unreasonable to fired it under the premise of signing a labor contract, it is unreasonable. The person in charge said in an interview. The issue of salary issuance is mainly to be dealt with seriously after the issue of the human resources department.
What to look at this problem from the perspective of the law? In the process of working, the worker must learn to retain evidence. Only in this way can he be invincible. The company shall pay wages on time, and the arrears of wages shall bear the corresponding legal responsibility. In this incident, the company announces the information that to dismiss their labor contract in the group. According to the labor contract law and labor dispute arbitration, mediation law, etc., the labor arbitration should be mentioned as soon as possible to protect their rights in accordance with the law to ensure that their legitimate rights and interests are not infringed.